SearchRecent blog posts
» more |
Please sign in to post or comment.
Bought speech-what the market will hear…Posted by gimpel on July 23, 2006 - 8:56 PM The identity of Hezbollah’s financial supporters is shielded, but Hezbollah most likely receives most of their funds from Iran and Syria. Hezbollah uses this financial support to, of course, attack Israel, but also to win about one –fourth of the seats in the Lebanese government. The Lebanese people voted for them. There is much deceit on the part of Hezbollah regarding their financial support. From islamreview.com Democracy Alliance is a liberal group funded mainly by George Soros, the billionaire who once pledged his entire fortune to the goal of defeating George Bush. Democracy Alliance was formed last year with major backing from billionaires such as financier George Soros and Colorado software entrepreneur Tim Gill. Why the secrecy? What are Soros and his group trying to hide? Submitted by imdstuf on July 25, 2006 - 1:55 PM.
Maybe they shield identity so George W's Secret Police cannot come do away with them. When you play around with those in charge, bad things can happen. Ted Kennedy got away with murder, so don't think the powerful can't get away with it. Submitted by g_dog_blog on July 26, 2006 - 9:24 PM.
Gempel, in my estimation, you missed it in the following statement: "The identity of Hezbollah’s financial supporters is shielded, but Hezbollah most likely receives most of their funds from Iran and Syria." The true identity of Hezbollah's financial support comes from Americans who continue to consume the same amount of gasoline they begrudgingly paid $1.59 per gallon for and are now happy when it is below $3.00 per gallon. Statistics are showing there has not been a decrease in consumption. That also goes for diesel, oil, natural gas, plastic, and other oil-based products. As long as we Americans selfishly pay the higher prices without finding ways to decrease our dependency, fuel prices will go up and more of that money will be given to terrorist organizations. We are the consumer and we have a hand in controlling the price by buying or not buying. The cost of refining fuel and exploration has not gone up dramatically in the last 20 years. There is not new technology that has transformed the process or increased the expense. The only thing that has really changed in the marketplace is the public's acceptance of higher fuel prices. Americans, not George W single handedly, fund terrorism. Syria, Iran, Saudia Arabia, Iraq, and other oil producing nations are only the conduits we use to send our money to the terrorists. Submitted by gimpel on July 26, 2006 - 10:22 PM.
well, I can't dispute that... and this is the site for further information on the specific programs Submitted by g_dog_blog on July 27, 2006 - 6:38 AM.
Yes, there are good things the government is doing for the future as far as lessening our dependency for oil but my concern is the here and now. It appears that the public does not care enough to curb their appetite for oil. Consumption is not going down. The politicians are using these issues to war against the other side rather than being leaders and focusing on putting an end to terrorism. The most effective and immediate way to combat terrorism for the short term is to remove the capability for them to fund their activities. You won't get rid of all of it, but the large majority of them will go back to work to support their families. Our politicians understand this but would rather use it for their own personal and party gain. Gee, that almost sounds like the terrorist. Promoting unity among Americans, encouraging support for our President and our troups, and showing us ways to conserve energy right now would remove their political leverage. This isn't a Democrat v.s. Republican issue but a civil rights and humanitarian issue. I applaud the President for what he has and is doing, now and for the future, but it is time for average Joe America to stop being selfish and begin to conserve fuel because we are funding terrorism. If we as consumers would dramatically reduce consumption the price of oil would go down. If the price goes down then the surplus money dries up, thereby dramatically reducing the funding for terrorism. You will not get rid of all of it but it would give democracy in Iraq a fighting chance to survive. Then, with the plans the President has put into action, we could return to our old ways. Conserve, share a ride, combine trips, spend one less hour out at the lake, ride a bus, carpool, stay home a little more often, tune up your car, if you can afford it buy a more fuel efficient car rather than a gas guzzler, put your thermostat up to 76 degrees, run ceiling fans... There is so much more we can do. Submitted by mgroothand on July 27, 2006 - 11:29 AM.
If y'all are assuming that mid-east oil fuels the violence and corruption there then y'all are overlooking the fact that much of the oil we use in the USA does not come from the mid-east. Canada, Mexico, the North Sea some South American countries are major suppliers of foreign oil to the USA. Submitted by g_dog_blog on July 28, 2006 - 7:45 PM.
There are other countries we buy from, but Opec sets the price and we do buy a lot from the Middle East. If we were to conserve fuel we might be able to conserve enough fuel to stop buying from the Middle East, thereby eliminating the cash flow to terrorist from America. This would help bring the cost of fuel down worldwide and would again reduce the extra monies going to terrorists. |
Monthly Archives for gimpel |


Recent comments
Posted 38 min ago by Retiredebetfreehappy
Posted 41 min ago by Retiredebetfreehappy
Posted 3 hours ago by siast36
Posted 4 hours ago by thrashman85
Posted 5 hours ago by bullet1114