Blogs @ Augusta.comLooking for photos? Check out Spotted

Recent comments

Syndicate

Syndicate content
Please sign in to post or comment.

Title game should bypass UGA

Posted by Scott Michaux on December 02, 2007 - 3:19 PM

I'll say this once and say it quickly before everything gets set later tonight.

Georgia deserves a chance to play for the national title in college football, but the Bulldogs do not deserve to play in the BCS Championship game.

 Understand?

Here's what I mean. UGA is certainly the hottest team in college football and worthy of a chance to compete in playoff system for a national championship. Nobody would want to draw them. They could win it all.

The problem is, there is no college football playoff system. And without it, Georgia should be bypassed in the current format by LSU.

Nothing against Georgia, but unless you can win your own conference or even your own division, you shouldn't get to compete to win the whole thing in the one-game system that has been set up. It should be that simple.

Why LSU? Because LSU won the SEC West then LSU won the SEC Championship game against a Tennessee team that Georgia lost to by mile. LSU lost its only two games in overtimes to winning programs. Georgia lost to a South Carolina team that lost its last five games.

And LSU beat more teams currently ranked in the polls (four) while Georgia beat only two (Florida and Auburn, which LSU also beat).

 Just because Georgia was ranked higher in the most recent BCS poll doesn't mean it should automatically move up into the title game against Ohio State. Any polls submitted before Sunday should be considered irrelevant. If you're going to have a stupid system based on popular acclamation, make a final assessment based on the whole season and not any preconceived notions.

Georgia turned a potentially bad season into a great one. It deserves a place in a marquee bowl. But without a playoff, is doesn't deserve any more than that.

Submitted by sonewall on December 04, 2007 - 9:57 AM.
AMEN!!

Submitted by drwego on December 04, 2007 - 10:34 AM.
Michaux, you are completely wet. Truth is if you're going to have a stupid system live with the stupid system. Do not change it at year end just cause you don't like the result of the stupidity. There is no rule about winning your conference. Oklahoma and others have won without winning their conference. If anybody deserved to jump above UGA it was Oklahoma. And excuse me but what did Ohio State do to get there except recieve a media coronation. They beat who? Where you and every other pundit are wrong is Ohio State. You just assumed they should move from #3 to #1. These guys fought off Akron and Kent and oh yea Youngstown State. Did they even play a top ten opponent? If you're not going to have a playoff, then drop the pretense. Quit telling the fans and the kids that play the game that it matters. Tell them they are just dupes in a system that is all about money and power. The real joke is that there isn't even an interesting "BS" bowl matchup. Man I can't wait for Va. Tech v. Kansas or Illinois USC.

Submitted by atlsfinest on December 05, 2007 - 10:54 PM.
What about teams that don't have a conference play off that have played in the championship game in the past? Stop trying to justify a idiotic system that everyone knows isn't fair or working properly...

Submitted by Scott Michaux on December 06, 2007 - 8:33 AM.

First of all, never accuse me of trying to justify the BCS system. I am perennially ranked No. 1 in the annual polls of people who loathe the BCS. That's well documented. 

Here is the reason there is not a conference championship qualification standard. Hypothetical: Let's say Ohio State went 11-1 with its only loss coming to 13th-ranked Illinois. It ends the season as the only 1-loss team in a major college conference and the pollsters vote the Buckeyes No. 1. Then say that Wisconsin went 10-2, with its only losses to non-conference teams. The Badgers, without playing Ohio State in the regular season, win the Big Ten despite languishing outside the top-10 in the polls. Because it doesn't have a conference championship game, Ohio State doesn't get the chance to prove it's better on the field. Should the Buckeyes not be eligible to play for a national title?

The BCS rules are to protect situations such as this, not to elevate a team that wasn't even able to qualify for its own conference championship game. Just because Nebraska played for the title in 2001 despite not qualifying for the Big 12 championship game doesn't mean that mistake should be perpetuated. Everyone knows Oregon got hosed that season. When there are legitmate arguments for the SEC conference champ to be ranked higher than another conference team that didn't qualify to play in the title game, why should another team get hosed just because the rules don't say that it can't be. Be reasonable, people.

Now you can argue all you want that the Big Ten is inferior or that it should have a conference title game. But just because the SEC and Big 12 and ACC decided for financial reasons that they wanted to have a conference championship game doesn't mean that every other conference should be forced to alter its long-standing tradition to follow suit. They knew those games posed a threat to postseason bowls and national title rankings when they created the revenue streams. They have to live with it, not everybody else.

No doubt Georgia could have beaten LSU in the Georgia Dome. But the Bulldogs missed that opportunity by losing to a Tennessee team that is hardly as talented. That's why they play the games. And that's why under the ignorant BCS system as it's set up, we can only argue and never prove who the true champions are. 


Submitted by mcdgary on December 06, 2007 - 1:52 PM.
Losing to SC could have been called an upset. At halftime at TENN they should have known and ready to accept if they did not come back in the 2nd half their chances at the "Big One" were not to be.

Submitted by imdstuf on December 07, 2007 - 5:52 PM.
New, blame SEC officials.  They are largely to blame for stirring up the BCS in the first place.